Electromagnetic radiation comes from both
naturally-occurring and manmade sources and is generally classified as either
ionizing or nonionizing, depending upon the amount of energy carried by the
radiation’s wave particles, or photons. The energy level is directly
proportional to and often expressed using the oscillation frequency of the
photons. Ionizing radiation is that occurring in the high energy ranges – e.g.,
gamma rays, ultraviolet light, x-rays - which is capable of stripping electrons
from atoms struck by the photons. The energy transferred in this reaction can
cause cellular damage or other harmful changes in chemical or biological
structures.
Nonionizing radiation, on the other hand, is that which
occurs in lower energy ranges – generally from the lower end of the ultraviolet
spectrum on down. Although generally thought of as safer, there are in some
ways more questions surrounding the biological effects of nonionizing forms of
radiation. Although we may know a great deal about the benefits and potential
dangers of infrared radiation (i.e., heat), we are still learning about the
effects of electric and magnetic fields.
Our understanding of ionizing radiation, which led to our
understanding of atomic structure, dates back to the late 19th
century. Early experiments led to an understanding of natural sources of
radiation, such as uranium and radium, as well as our ability to produce
radiation via a high charge electrical field, such as is done today with diagnostic
x-ray equipment.
And although there are benefits to be gained from the
utilization of ionizing radiation – nuclear fission to produce electricity,
x-rays for medical diagnosis, radioisotope therapy for some forms of cancers,
etc. – there are also potentially harmful biological effects. When electrons
are stripped from atoms within a living cell, the remaining anion is highly
reactive and can trigger a series of chemical reactions which damage cellular
structures and function. While some of this damage can be repaired, damage to
DNA can result in cellular death or can result in changes that lead, sometimes
several years later, to the development of cancer.
For this reason, exposures to manmade sources of radiation
are typically tightly regulated. Within my own work setting, our x-ray and CT
rooms are required to be lead-lined to prevent transmission of x-rays through
walls. Personnel are required to wear lead-lined personal protective gear to
limit exposure when we must be present in the room for imaging (which is most
of the time when taking x-rays), and all staff who use the equipment must wear
radiation dosimetry badges, so that our monthly and cumulative doses can be
monitored.
Natural sources of ionizing radiation are somewhat more
difficult to control and monitor. We are all bombarded with cosmic rays
constantly, as these high energy rays can pass readily through buildings.
People who fly frequently in commercial jets are exposed to even higher levels,
since there is less attenuation by the atmosphere at higher altitudes. Here in
New England, the large concentration of granitic deposits are also a
terrestrial source for ionizing radiation, as they contain numerous radioactive
isotopes, including uranium.
One of the by-products of radioactive decay in granitic
substrates is radon gas, which can accumulate in basements with dirt floors
(such as my own). Because radon is heavier than air and because it decays
rapidly to a solid radionuclide, it can accumulate in the lungs and act as a
source of long-term exposure, which can increase the risk of lung cancer.
Because Maine has a fairly shallow soil layer overlying largely granitic rock,
much of the state is classified as Zone 1 for radon exposure potential by the
EPA, which means exposures here are among the highest (http://www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap.html).
Of course, we are almost all constantly exposed now to
mandmade nonionizing radiation. Most houses are replete with electronic
devices, such as computers, stereos, microwave ovens, televisions, etc. – all of
which produce magnetic fields. Most Americans now own cell phones, many use
Bluetooth devices to communicate through their phones, and cell towers are
continuing to pop up all over the country to expand network coverage. All of
these things increase ambient nonionizing radiation levels.
Cell phones, in particular, have been a source of
considerable controversy in the last several years, at least since Hardell, et
al. (1999) first posited a possible link between cell phone usage and brain
tumors. The most recent report on the Interphone Study conducted by the
International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Standing
Committee on Epidemiology, however, found no association between cell phone
usage and an increase in glioma or meningioma occurrence at this time. Although
the authors did report some limitations with the study, they noted that the
heaviest users were actually more likely to overestimate past usage, which
would tend to bias findings toward a positive association (Swerdlow, et al.,
2011). Additionally, these findings do not preclude the possibility that an
association might become apparent in another 5 to 10 years or longer.
Perhaps the take-home message should be: Don’t be afraid to
use your cell phone, but try to turn it off and walk away from time to time.
REFERENCES
Moeller, D.W. Environmental Health, Fourth Edition. Harvard
University Press. 2011.
Hardell, L., et al. “Use of cellular telephones and the risk
for brain tumours: A case-control study”. International Journal of Oncology.
15(1): 113-116. 1999.
Swerdlow, A.J., et al. “Mobile phones, brain tumors, and the
Interphone Study: Where are we now?”. Environmental Health Perspectives.
119(11): 1534-1538. 2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment